Coexist?

Tim Hillis, PhD

Yeshua told His followers that as the end approaches it was important to be watchful. Over the centuries this has seemingly meant something different, depending on who you ask. If we were to ask Him, however, we'll always get the same answer. Because you see, He was pointing out that while 'no man can know the day or hour of His appearing', we CAN discern the seasons and the signs of the times.

The people and religious leadership didn't expect Messiah to show up when Yeshua/Jesus did for a number of reasons; but the biggest reason was because they'd left God's calendar. You see, Abba cares so much for His people that He created a calendar which ONLY HE could start each year. It was dependent upon seeing the astrological signs that only God can produce, in the right timing. Putting it simply, Yom Teruah (Day of Trumpets) is the beginning of the agricultural new year. But evidence must be present for it to begin, if is not available then then it is on hold until the evidence appears for the beginning of the New Year (Rosh Hashanah 0r Renewed Year). 

The evidence is:

• Sighting of the first sliver of the Rosh Chodesh (New Moon/Renewed Moon) by two witnesses. They are interviewed separately and their testimonies much match perfectly

This can also be affected by other things such as the "abib-ness" of the barley crop at specific times of the Hebrew Calendar; but I don't want this to become our focus... All that is a foreshadowing of how we can "watch" (as if for the Renewed Moon) and know the "signs of the times". The Feasts of YHVH all have a prophetic insight. The Spring Feasts show us the birth, life, ministry, death, burial, resurrection, and ascension of our Savior - and He fulfilled them all. The Fall Feasts are a prophetic picture of the End-Times. If we understand the prophetic picture of them we can indeed recognize when the "end is near". 

Don't worry, we aren't there yet and Act 3:21 confirms it. However, we are entering a time when having wisdom to see and discernment to understand the subtleties of deception our enemy intends to bring. He is no match for our King, but he is not stupid either. Deceiving those who have no clue isn't much of a challenge, but to potentially deceive even the very elect, as Scripture says his work is nearly good enough to do, requires skill at deceit.

Isn't Unity a GOOD Thing?

Coexist... It sounds like just the thing our world needs, doesn't it? But what if the true desires of those who make it happen are not as benevolent as it seems?

What if the selfless way in which they speak of it and promote it is not the actual agenda?

What if, the champion is not so selfless after all?

What if...

...what if the actual agenda were to make it possible for a single individual to have authority over every religious entity that decides to go along with the message of unity?

Well, if you're reading this, I can probably assume you are a believer in Yeshua as Messiah and that the God of the Bible the God of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob, along with the Holy Spirit who was formally introduced to the Body-Bride 50 days after the resurrection of Yeshua/Jesus are the only ones who can be entrusted with such a feat.

So it is with these questions in mind I will lay out a small fraction of the information I discovered while researching for some future teaching projects.

Introduction

It is with a most sincere heart of prayer that I want to share the following information regarding what appears to be the early stages of a coalition to secure the foundation and begin building the walls of a One World Religion. The clues I found and followed have shocked me and if it were not for the ways in which Abba revealed the information to me, it may have shaken my very trust in those whom I once regarded as unshakable in their walk with Christ.

In my law enforcement career, both as a civil servant/tactical operator and having worked in a broad field ranging from executive protection to being on a special team assembled for protecting oil refineries under the direction of government contracts; I've had the privilege of having been trained in a variety of investigative techniques. I have found those techniques useful in my research of Scripture because they taught me how to follow evidence in a way that leads to other substantial evidence and how to weed out evidence which will not produce fruit. The rules of an investigation can be as simple as allowing the evidence to create further evidence by determining if what you have found is part of a pattern. When patterns begin to emerge, it is wise to keep your eyes and ears open for anything else which could potentially be a piece of the puzzle, but to never force the issue by actively pushing for evidence. This is often one of the best methods for allowing a case to form for you, rather than creating one which can lead to false determinations. If you force it, the evidence then becomes the object of the investigation and instead cerates a desire for the fruit to be a predetermined outcome. In other words, don't allow yourself to desire to find out that your suspicions are correct because it will jade your ability to objectively view your evidence.

This is not the advisable method for a situation with exigent circumstances (an emergency situation) like finding a serial murderer. You'd need to be far more aggressive in those kinds of cases. But the one place it fits incredibly well, and I might even say is the perfect fit for this, is when you begin to see a pattern forming which you weren't really looking for to begin with. As is the case in this documentation of a line of evidence which began to form while I was studying a number of other things.

Those things included: 

• Bible Translation History
• Prophetic Pictures within Chanukah (Hanukkah)
• The true meaning of the Ekklesia (Ecclesia)
• Lives and sacrifices of the early Reformers (From Wycliff to Luther)
• and a few other small studies for personal edification

As I mentioned, over these last several months I have been picking up on a trend which concerns me, in fact a number of them which I believe are about to converge and when they do, it may be both a triumphant and traumatic event.

We are told in Matthew 26:41 “to watch and pray so we will not fall into temptation”. Falling into implies a pit or trap of some kind. In Matthew 24:24 Yeshua warned His disciples of the coming of “false Messiahs”, actually that could be interpreted as “counter-Messiahs”, that they would perform miracles, signs, and wonders. He also warned in Matthew 7:22 that “MANY” will say on the day of judgment that “they prophesied, cast out devils, and did many miracles in His Name – yet they had no intimacy with Him”.

We can look around us and see the increasing deterioration of family, of community, of unity in society and the “church” alike. We can see the breakdown of conscience, empathy, and general concern for others. An unprecedented level of apathy has overtaken entire sections of the world. A numbing to seek after the discarded values of the American past is being squeezed out of people all over the world who once looked to the United States as a barometer for social concern and global welfare. The sentiments which once made American values a staple and even something to be looked up to and desirable by other people groups has slowly been etched away until now those same people groups and nations look upon us in disdain – seeing us as backwards and self-righteous. A spirit has arisen which minimizes all the effort of previous generations' concern with passing on good moral character and citizenship to the next generation(s). Not only has it become a situation of apathetic disregard but an active desire to remove such things from global society. In fact, it has crept into the churches, and places of Godly worship, all over the world as well. Even in once healthy houses of worship, New World mysticism has replaced laying on our faces before God until our hearts are so emblazoned with a burden for the lost that miracles spontaneously abound.

When my grandparents attended a small Assembly of God church in Williamsville, Missouri they would have Friday night prayer meetings that lasted until Saturday evening. They would not stop until they were “released by the Holy Spirit”. I learned about intercession from their examples. They knew what it was like to pray until their knees didn't hurt any longer and continue praying until it hurt to try and get back up! Now we can't even recognize when subtle changes are made to the character of our own Saviour by the removal of words and phrases from new editions of the Bible.

Let's begin there...

For centuries there has been a plan (for lack of a better word at the moment) to change the Scripture which we hold dear. Starting with the changing of the Textus Receptus  (Received Text)  originally the work of the Greek language scholar  Desiderius Erasmus from 1516-1535. This was the first Greek Manuscript which corrected the errors in the Latin Vulgate Bible used by the Catholic Church at that time. Erasmus' work stirred a community within the Catholic Church and likely did more to help the early Reformers than any work previously done. Though a pro-Catholic theologian, he was apparently an honest scholar. His Greek Bible corrected corruption in the Latin Bible and there was much. Because His work allowed other theologians of his day to read the Greek and the corrected Latin side by side an anti-papacy sentiment grew. His was the very first parallel Bible. So it also gave educated readers the ability to quickly see the errors in the Latin Bible of the Catholic Church.

The Textus Receptus should not be confused with the original groups of Greek Manuscripts which had been tediously copied on papyrus by scribes and followers of the teaching of the First Century Apostles. Those would most likely be the closest to the original teachings of the Apostles, but most of those which had been discovered (and there were far fewer in the time of Erasmus than now) had so decayed that only fragments remained. Since there were multiple copies of said “books of the Bible” differing pieces had survived from one discovered collection to another. Much of Scripture had been pieced together from the surviving fragments of multiple discovered collections. So the Textus Receptus was pretty much the single most important Biblical collection work ever completed, and it is nearly without doubt that in his day Erasmus was the single most qualified scholar to accomplish this task.

During this same era the Society of Jesus (the Order of the Jesuits was established and set about to create a counter reformation movement which frankly was very successful. They also eventually had as a goal, to infiltrate and destroy the Seminaries of the Protestants. The idea being that they could gain notoriety as scholars, since many of them were very well educated, and begin twisting the Protestant Doctrine being taught to the Seminary students with humanism and heresy. They were quite successful in this endeavor as well.

As centuries passed, the Jesuit Order has seemingly not changed their original goals, though they have also been expelled from a number of countries after being caught in all types of espionage against religious and political leaders including Kings and Queens of nations. Something interesting is that the Jesuits have always had a member of their Order involved in every major Bible Translation project throughout modern history. A well sourced documentary series of videos on the topic can be found on our video page: Remnant Nation Info-tainment.

The 3 part series is:

1. A Lamp in the Dark
2. Tares Among the Wheat
3. Bridge to Babylon
   
   

   If you have trouble playing these, you can request Free Membership to our Video Page HERE. <<< Link

You'll notice in the Britannica.com site (hyperlinked to “Order of the Jesuits” above) the staunch position of the Jesuit Order to the supremacy of the papacy (the Pope). So much so that it has led to their demise on more than one occasion, yet they continue to be revived by a later member of the papacy and come back stronger and more influential each time. It has been admitted by one tenured professor of the institution that a major Theological Seminary in the US has been targeted by the “ecumenical” teaching which began with the Jesuits cited in the same Britannica.com article hyperlinked above. In fact, if one just listens to the messages of many television preachers of today, you can detect the ecumenical mantra of grace and love covers a multitude of sins, as if a God who would hold us accountable to the entirety of His Word (and not small pieces which we cherry pick and then “interpret” using our own philosophy) would be a God of hate and not the God of Love found in the Bible. They can get away with it because in modern Bible translations the amount of information regarding the Blood of Yeshua/Jesus, the deity of Yeshua/Jesus, the Supremacy of the Word over its “preachers”, the supremacy of the Word over the papacy, and much more... equals to the removal of 1st and 2nd Peter. Yes, they are small books, but if you were to fill a notepad with nothing but references to the above named things enough times to equal their combined sizes, that is a LOT of references to the work of Yeshua/Jesus being done away with.

Modern Logo for the Diocese of San Diego Office of Ecumenism

Perhaps you already know them by their Commonly Used Global/Universal Logo

Representing from left to right: 

Islam, New Age, Science, Judaism, Paganism 
(which includes satanism), Buddhism, Christianity

We'll come back to ecumenism but I want to point out a few things regarding the changing of work in Bible Translation that I came across as I dug all of this out.

I will be watching this closely and plan to post additional resources to the end of this book. You will be able to use the same link to come back periodically and find the updates. This book will remain Free of Charge for as long as I can do so. Please comeback to the link often to see what other resources have been uncovered. I pray for many Blessings to you for joining me on this quest.

For centuries, Bible translators sought to convey the best word for word translation of the Sacred Text of Scripture in their own language, the vernacular of the people of that day. They mostly used the Textus Receptus as a primary source for their translation until the completion of the Authorized King James Bible, also known as the 1611 King James Bible. Without diving too deeply into this subject I want to point out that men like William Tyndale and other early Reformers were Biblical Scholars well versed in Biblical Greek though it seems Tyndale may have been the first to have also been well versed in Biblical Hebrew. (if you want a more thorough history on Tyndale <<click).

Tyndale's completed work was published after his martyrdom by the Catholic Church on charges of heresy partly because he would not translate some words to say what they wanted. The later 1611 King James has been digitized in recent times and analyzed against the Matthews Bible which was actually all of Tyndale's completed work that was finished by his good friend John Rogers – Tyndale was murdered after completing the entire "New Testament" and a good portion of the "Old Testament". All of these were examples of word for word translations into the common vernacular of the people who would be reading them.

During this process it has been recorded that the Jesuits compiled a plan under their founder Ignatius Loyola (a Spanish soldier who served in the Inquisition) to change the way Scripture is viewed. He is noted as having referred to any word for word translation of Scripture from the Hebrew and Greek as “a wretched book”. His sentiment was that such Bibles stood in the way of the “Counter Reformation” - the attempts to bring the Protestants back under the authority of the Pope of Rome.

Since we will begin to discuss Bible Translation manuscripts next, I'd like to give you some very interesting statistics. Nearly all modern Bible Translations are based on the usage of the Wescott and Hort or the Nestle-Aland edition (aka Novum Testamentum Graece) manuscripts. The W&H manuscript is based upon approximately 45 ancient documents which disagree with one another about 33% of the time. The Textus Receptus is based on approximately 4,500 documents which are in agreement about 99% of the time. Let's see what else these manuscripts can tell us, shall we?

For a number of years, many people attempted to find the “oldest” manuscripts in order to make a claim that they had something "closer" to the truth than all the others. The general consensus among those who became known as “higher critics” of Scripture was that the older a manuscript was, the more genuine it is. But frankly, we know from the Apostles that imposters had already begun the work of writing false Gospels and copying Gnostic beliefs into letters they forged claiming to be from the Apostles of the First Century! So even if one would find such a document (such as the papyri of Egypt) it may be the oldest manuscript in possession, but it is still corrupt and would only result in a corrupt Bible. Still many sought to win this battle of the oldest manuscript. One such man, Konstantin Tischendorf, discovered what has been hailed as a 4th Century manuscript in Greek known as Codex Sinaiticus (pictured above). It is the most complete set of documents ever found together and I believe it to be an expertly created hoax. If you watch the 3 movies mentioned on pages 14 & 15 you will see why I believe this and can then form your own opinion. In short, part of why I believe this is because it nearly parallels the Codex Vaticanus (pictured below) – also a Greek manuscript which is reported to be from the 4th Century. It had apparently not been seen by any known recorded theologian before the 15th Century and a monk happened to find it sitting on a shelf in the library of the Vatican. It is said to nearly be in complete agreement with the Latin Bible used by early Catholicism. It seems odd to me that the "oldest Bible" to agree with the Latin would go unnoticed and unuse d by the ONLY religion which used Latin in it's services, when it was in their possession allalong. It is alsosuspect because they believed, as many Catholics do today, that Latin IS the language of the Bible; and yet they would let this ancient treasure which could add credence to their point just sit on a shelf in a basement??

There is one more document we need to discuss before moving on. The manuscript of Wescott and Hort. This particular document was created by two men who may have been somewhat scholarly in their own rights, but their ability to pull off a complete translation and editing of Scripture is questionable at best. Trained in Classical Greek, neither were familiar enough with Hebrew to understand the nuances of Koine Greek. A version of Greek unique to "Jews" and "Jewish Culture. WIthout a solid grasp of Hebrew, their understanding of the idoims, colloquilaisms, and word puns in Koine would be sketchy at best and negatively impact their accuracy greatly. Yet, their document is what is used as the basis of the New Testament for many modern Bibles you find on the shelf of any bookstore today. As if their questionable skill as translators isn't enough, their manuscript agrees with the Codex Vaticanus in nearly every way. It is this horrible manuscript which removes much of the Scriptures referring to the deity of Yeshua/Jesus, the blood of Messiah, the supremacy of the Word over the words of ANY man, etc. (I hope you are beginning to see the pattern I did as I went through the materials I have been studying for the last several months.} Their self admitted goal was to crush the future use of the "vile Textus Receptus", the Masoretic, and the Antiochian/Graeco-Syrian texts (used in the production of the 1611 King James Bible) to assist in the "modern translation of Bibles". They were both quite committed to the papacy and though professing Protestants, their true beliefs were revealed as debates over their text ensued. Also a great many things expressed in their private letters to one another revealed an apostate view of God, the Trinity, Scripture, literal Mary Worship, etc.

Below are a couple of graphics which were made from exact screenshots and the only editing was to crop them to the pertinent information. In the first, see the Greek (from the Textus Receptus - possibly Erasmus' but likely Stephanos' work - circa 1550) and English the Text (King James Version) used for Mark 7:19.  In the second see the same verse in the New American Standard Version which used the Wescott and Hort Greek New Testament - circa 1881-1890. You can see, and verify, for yourself the corruption and level of subversion to Scripture, this centuries old effort to undermine Scripture really goes. If they are willing to add what may have been Scribal notes (Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers) as if it were an actual command from our Messiah, then what other things might they add or subtract to support an agenda? At least the NASB put it in parentheses. Most modern Bibles using Wescott and Hort, do NOT!

Pics/screenshots on the next page...

PS - let's not forget that the total number of words/phrases/sentences removed from the Textus Receptus in the development of the Wescott and Hort Greek New Testament is equal to the sum total of all of 1st and 2nd Peter combined. I can provide you a list of those words/phrases/sentences which will get you started on your own investigation. Go Here  to ask for it.

Has the quest to “unify” translation of the Bible finally found an end? 

Meet Australian-American media mogul Rupert Murdoch. In the 1980's he purchased a number of publishing companies and consolidated them into a creation named “Harper-Collins”. Some time later (between 2007 and 2011) Murdoch purchased both Zondervan and Thomas Nelson Publishing, likely using the pseudonym “Harper- Collins” as the purchasing entity. An odd connection to Zondervan and Thomas Nelson is with the International Bible Society. Why would that be strange? Because since about 1969 the IBS has had a council re-creating Bible translations with the goal of creating a Bible accepted by all religions. Every council of the IBS has had, as the representative of the Vatican (by special appointment from a Pope)... you probably guessed it, a Jesuit. Also of note, you can go to the IBS Website and see their official endorsement of the NIV published by none other than Zondervan. It was originally published by the IBS.

I decided to run a search for the “international bible society” (I've found that removing capital letters from words tends to filter out the extreme sites a little and puts them lower in the results so I can find what I am looking for more quickly). One of the results is copied and pasted below – directly from Yahoo's featured results. 

“Biblica, The International Bible Society, was founded in 1809 and is the worldwide copyright holder of the New International Version of the Bible, licensing commercial rights to Zondervan in the United States... en.wikipedia.org”

Lastly, on this odd marriage of strange bedfellows, is that Harper Collins also seemingly owns the publishing rights to Anton LaVey's Satanic Bible. Coincidence? Maybe...

Let's get back to ecumenism...

One thing we know about End Times prophecy which seems to agreed upon by nearly every Biblical Scholar and student of Eschatology is found in Revelation chapter 17. If you're familiar with it, you can skip below and just go to the commentary.

Revelation 17

It is widely accepted that the “whore of Babylon” is the One World Religion which will be formed from every major religion on earth. This is where an understanding of the “ecumenical” work of the Jesuits becomes vitally important.

I learned a long time ago that for any doctrine to be worthy of release as sound and profitable for the people of God, it must be found in more than just one Scripture. As I have developed this concept in my own studies, I have learned that a truly sound doctrine will weave a common thread throughout the entirety of God's Word. I have also observed that as evidence of prophetic fulfillment occurs there is almost always a common thread there as well. I believe the thread to watch in regard to Revelation 17 is the “ecumenical movement”. 

What exactly is  
Modern Ecumenism?

Ecumenism | Christianity | Britannica.com  

Ecumenism, the movement or tendency toward worldwide Christian unity or cooperation. The term, of recent origin, emphasizes what is viewed as the universality of the Christian churches. Christianity:Ecumenism

The current ecumenical movement however is not just about Christian denominations, as can be seen in two of the logos they commonly use, and pictured on pages 16 & 17. The current ecumenical movement is about uniting all religions. It began with working toward creating a Bible the whole world can agree upon. After all, even Islam doesn't deny that Yeshua/Jesus was a holy man. They just put him on a level playing field with Mohamed. Not unlike the Vatican and its exultation of the Pope who is known as the “Vicar of Christ” or “the one who rules vicariously in the place of Christ”. It's not much of a jump to see the similarities. The Pope is equal to Yeshua/Jesus in the Catholic theological perspective. Also, since the Quran allows it's devotees to make a “contract” with an infidel if it advances the cause of Islam, this is not at all surprising.

Taken from Al-Islam.org: (parenthetical Inserts are mine)

(How can I conceal my belief's convictions, etc at a later time once I've revealed them? Also, how can one predict “eminent danger” for the future? Eminent means it's happening NOW. This is clearly rhetoric to make it seem as though this is not always premeditated or considered well in advance of choosing to do so.)

Second, there are numerous exceptions to the above definition, and they MUST be judged according to the situation that one is placed in. As such, one should NOT make a narrow- minded generalization that encompasses all situations, thereby failing to fully absorb the spirit of the definition. (Situational ethics used to be considered a sign of low morals and lack of integrity)

Third, the word "beliefs”and/or "convictions”does NOT necessarily mean "religious” beliefs and/or convictions. (WHAT?!?! More rhetoric to be “interpreted” based on the circumstances – more situational ethics.)

Clearly the Quran doesn't find it unacceptable to make a pact unless it will increase the cause of Islam. One commentator on the Islamic Doctrine of Al-Taqiyya said this: 

“There are several forms of lying to non- believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya (the Shia name). These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers (non-Muslims) in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.”

Quran (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves" against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim may appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel friendly.

Quran (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths is with pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway. (The next verse refers only to those who have a personal agreement with Muhammad as individuals - see Ibn Kathir vol 4, p 49)

Quran (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you the dissolution of your oaths..."

Quran (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.

  Quran (2:225)"Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts"

Quran (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means 'deceit'. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)

Collectively these verses of the Quran are usually interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose.

We need to acknowledge a simple fact; aligning with the Vatican would give Islam more influence than it currently has on it's own. Is it not also possible that if this is the coalition which will lead to the One World Religion of Revelation 17 that Islam or a derivative of Islam could serve as the later enforcers? We know that Al-Qaeda, ISIS and other Islamic terror groups use beheading as a means of torture... are they the fulfillment of Revelation 20:4? Would it not also give them opportunity to conquer and overtake when the opportunity to do so presented itself? Or at the very least position them to be seen by a future global leader who may find their methods and approach useful? Maybe even useful enough to replace a Vatican ruled religion with one which more closely embraces the "submission" Islam promotes? Islam means "submit" or "submission" and by all means necessary is implied.

Revelation 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

NOTE: See the reference link "Article Detailing Plans for a Base of Operations for the Ecumenical Agreement Between Sunni Islam and the Vatican" in the Additional Resources at the end of this paper." As you read the agreement between the Imam and Pope Francis, and the info about the coming facility which appears to be a planned building for 2022, keep in mind ISIS is Sunni...

Concerning Judaism's role in the ecumenical movement:

In a short documentary called “Donald Trump Third Temple for Whole World” (it actually contains next to nothing about Donald Trump) the modern day Sanhedrin claims Islam believes when the Messiah of Israel comes (since they believe he has not come yet) he will also be the Imam Mahdi (final Imam before the Judgment of the World). Other rabbinic leaders in the video go on to say that the Temple will be a place for all nations to worship – as with an ecumenical one world religion. The video is 14 minutes long and can be seen HERE. This is really quite amazing.

If the Vatican is indeed still involved in a Counter-Reformation, how far has it gotten? Who have they reached? What organizations and denominations are involved? What ministries are on board?

Before you click on any of the videos on page 24, I strongly request you watch “START HERE ” first. It puts a number of things together so the following videos make sense. I tried to use actual video from the ministries instead of edited sound bites. So there is very little commentary on most of the videos. Some I could not find original footage, so I had no choice but to choose videos posted by people who are obviously critics.

I preferred originals because I am not posting any of this to defame. These ministries clearly need our prayerful support. They need intercession to open their eyes to what is happening right under their noses.

The current ecumenical movement is not the beginning of unity in the faith, it is the ending of a very long goal – to bring protestants back under the papacy. You may ask “how can you say that?”. Well it's simple really.

Catholics teach that every mass Yeshua/Jesus is crucified again (literally) for their sins which have been confessed the day before in the confessional booth. It is known as the doctrine of the Eucharist. Catholics believe in transubstantiation; a doctrine that says the sacraments of communion are the literal blood, flesh and bones of Yeshua/Jesus brought forth by miraculous power given to the priest administering the sacraments. This is done by a special prayer of invocation (I call it an incantation – because this is just like witchcraft) – also Scripture prohibits cannibalism. The sacraments are a metaphoric means of our partaking in His suffering because He was a once and for all sacrifice and cannot nor is it necessary to EVER crucify Him again. The Catholic church ignores the First and Second Commandment with the belief in the Supremacy and Infallibility of the Pope and the use of statues and portraits of saints as objects to whom prayers are uttered. Yet, they believe by changing a single doctrine “the protest is over”. It just doesn't work that way – it is the same as calling evil good and good evil. It is a semantic mess of rhetoric designed to woo people into a false sense of unity by claiming there is now no difference between Catholicism and Biblical Instruction. But you will not find a single video or article from those promoting ecumenism which admits they have no intention of changing any of their other heretical teachings or methods of worship.

Yes a Catholic can be born again and Spirit immersed/baptized... but you cannot have those experiences and remain a faithful Catholic (as outlined in the paragraph above) AND expect to remain a place where Holy Spirit wants to dwell. He comes to lead and guide us into all truth; if we reject His very ministry to us by continuing to practice a religion which is a lie, why would He remain?

Conclusion

The information in this E-Book is barely even the tip of the iceberg. What I have presented here is less than 5% of the total number of converging bits of a much larger scenario. Is it a “conspiracy”? I don't know. What I do know is that it fits the Biblical Model and we need to pay attention to it, even if it turns out to be nothing. We can't live in fear and we can't live in constant suspicion of others. Nor can we live in ignorance. Yeshua did say however, to "be wise as serpents..." Genesis tells us "serpents are the most cunning of creatures"; they have an unparalleled ability to avoid being caught off guard and trapped or cornered. This is partly why Yeshua was always able to avoid the traps of the religious leaders of His day. They would ask a question intended to trap Him in some kind of theological or doctrinal dilemma, He would respond with a question which if answered honestly would have revealed the heart of His would be trappers.

PLEASE – join us in praying for the eyes of these incredible leaders who once preached and taught holiness and Scriptural worship undefiled by the world's influence. The subtlety of what is being passed off as acceptable and loving and kind is horrific it will eventually lead to a dependence upon someone other than Yeshua/Jesus as the ONLY way to our HEAVENLY FATHER! Please pray Abba will be able to reach them and draw them back to their first love. We have to remember: 2 Corinthians 11:4 For if he who comes to you would preach another Yeshua to you, whom we have not preached to you, or you should receive another spirit which you have not received, or another gospel which you have not received, you may well be persuaded.

2 Corinthians 11:4 For if he who comes to you would preach another Yeshua to you, whom we have not preached to you, or you should receive another spirit which you have not received, or another gospel which you have not received, you may well be persuaded.

AND

Galatians 1:8

For those of you who have already seen the patterns I described here, thank you for taking the time to read this anyways. For those of you to whom this was a surprise, well it was to me in some ways. I knew we were heading in this direction, but I had no idea how “deep the rabbit hole goes” already. I hope you all find the information within the video and website articles enlightening to the fact of how much ministries all over the world need our intercession. Naphtali and I certainly do, and ask for it, we want to share light and hope in Messiah and His Word, not the doctrine of fear or escapism. With bold faith, let's all approach the Throne of Grace (Empowerment) and make His Name known.

Pray without ceasing. Let us not become critical, but we must remain vigilant. If cynicism is our response, then the enemy has already won! We cannot neglect to seek Abba on behalf of the leaders who are following "another Jesus". We cannot stop having compassion and heart felt remorse on their behalf. May we as the nation of Abba YHVH never stop crying out for a renewal of His mercy and a cry of repentance to come forth from us all for the idolatry we have allowed in our midst.

Something to Consider

Additional Resources

Additional Updates:

01/09/2025 - We have finally been able to track down reliable information regarding the "Chrislam Center" allegedly in Dubai. It does not exist and was a pretty decent scam being run with multiple sources "confirming it". However, we recently discovered something of similar interest. The Abrahamic Family House, built on another manmade island in the UAE, was commissioned to be built in 2019 and inaugurated in 2023. How is it that a massive complex of buildings dedicated to peaceful coexistence between Islam, Judaism, and Christianity (and built during a global pandemic at the height of global lockdowns) did not show up in every single news outlet on our planet!?! Take a look at the complex on their official website - HERE. One can only hope that following the money trail from Sudan will not lead back to the Abrahamic Family House in any conceivable way.

Publish YOUR Book with Remnant Nation Press

Do you write a Blog, keep a Facebook page, or maybe a journal that you can or have put into a Word doc? You may have a completed book in the pages of your Blog or Facebook account & not even realize it. Let us Help.

How about a bunch of recipes that you put together in an electronic file?

Remnant Nation Press can help. We have the ability to parse your Blog posts, Facebook page, FB Documents, or Word files and compile them into a book just like this one!! AND we can do it in record time. We can even assist you in submitting it to a global publisher and distributing your new E-Book through every major online outlet. Imagine YOUR NEW EBOOK on:

We are specialists in getting your material ready for publication and we work with one of the worlds largest publishers. From start to finish we can get you from Project to Publication for Less $$ than our competitors.

You decide - do you just want a print and E-Book ready manuscript? Or do you want us to do the work from start to finish and get you published?

Drop us a quick note and we'll get back to you within 3 business days with all the details you'll need to decide when to begin your project. Just put "Send Me E-Book Info" in the Subject Line.

CLICK HERE TO SEND US A MESSAGE